Quelques suggestions

La prparation de hot-dogs est plus facile et plus rapide: Prchauffez la machine grillades pendant minutes. Dposez les hot-dogs longitudinalement sur le gril et cuisez pendant 2-1/2 minutes ou jusquau degr de rtissage dsir. Prparez des crpes de pommes de terre sautes en un tourne-main. Prchauffez la machine grillades pendant minutes. Dposez les crpes de pommes de terre sur le gril et cuisez pendant environ la moiti du temps suggr sur lemballage pour une cuisson au four. Pour peler des poivrons frais, vous pouvez les passer au gril pendant minutes. La machine grillades est idale pour griller les sandwichs au fromage. 7.

Important Safeguards

When using electrical appliances, basic safety precautions should always be followed, including the following: 1. Read all instructions. 2. 3. Do not touch hot surfaces. Use handles or knobs. To protect against fire, electric shock and injury to persons, do not immerse cord, plugs, or cooking unit in water or other liquid. Close supervision is necessary when any appliance is used by or near children. Unplug from outlet when not in use and before cleaning. Allow to cool before putting on or taking off parts, and before cleaning the appliance. Do not operate any appliance with a damaged cord or plug or after the appliance malfunctions, or has been damaged in any manner. Contact consumer service for return authorization. The use of accessory attachments not recommended by the appliance manufacturer may result in fire, electric shock, or injury to persons. Do not use outdoors. Do not leave this appliance unattended while in use. Do not let cord hang over edge of table or counter, or touch hot surfaces. Do not place on or near a hot gas or electric burner, or in a heated oven. To disconnect, grasp plug and remove from wall outlet. Do not use appliance for other then intended use. Extreme caution must be used when moving an appliance containing hot oil or other hot liquids. This appliance is for household use only.
8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

Save These Instructions

Getting To Know Your GR30/GR30CB Grilling Machine
Lamelles de boeuf Polynsienne
4 c. table de sauce soya 2 gousses dail, minces 2 c. th de miel onces de boeuf en lamelles Combinez les 3 premiers ingrdients. Faites mariner les lamelles de viande dans le mlange pendant environ une heure au rfrigrateur. Prchauffez le gril pendant minutes. Dposez les lamelles de viande sur le gril. Laissez cuire pendant 3 minutes. Ouvrez le gril et ajoutez le reste de la marinade sur la viande. Laissez griller encore une minute. Ouvrez le gril et servez la viande sur un lit de riz. Donne 4 portions.

Burritos

2 petits oignons, hachs 4 gousses dail, minces 4 tasses de viande hache, de boeuf minc ou de morceaux de poulet 2-1/2 tasses de sauce chili en bote 2 c. th de sel 1 c. th de cannelle et cumin Prchauffez le gril pendant minutes. Ajoutez les oignons et lail et faire sauter pendant une minute. Ajoutez la viande et laissez cuire pendant 3 minutes ou jusqu cuisson complte. Ajoutez la sauce chili et lassaisonnement et mlangez bien jusqu ce quils soit chauds. Retirez du gril. Donne 8 Burritos Enroulez dans des tortillas pralablement rchauffs et garnissez de guacamole, de crme sre, de fromage Jack miett.

1. 2 3. 4. 5. 6.

Grilling Machine Body Grilling Machine Grilling Plates Drip Tray Plastic Spatula Power Light Cord
Poitrines de poulet moutarde et citron
2 c. table de moutarde 2 c. table de vinaigre balsamique 3 c. table de jus de citron 2 gousses dail, minces 1 c. th de paprika onces de poitrines de poulet sans peau, coupes en deux Prchauffez le gril pendant minutes. Mlangez ensemble les 5 premiers ingrdients. Ajoutez les poitrines de poulet et laissez-les mariner pendant au moins une demi-heure. Dposez le poulet marin sur le gril et fermez le couvercle. Laissez cuire environ 3-1/2 minutes. Retirez et servez. Donne 4 portions.

Polarized Plug

This appliance has a polarized plug (one blade is wider than the other): To reduce the risk of electric shock, this plug is intended to fit into a polarized outlet only one way. If the plug does not fit fully in the outlet, reverse the plug. If it still does not fit, contact a qualified electrician. Do not attempt to modify the plug in any way.

Short Cord Instructions

A short power-supply cord is provided to reduce the risk resulting from becoming entangled in or tripping over a longer cord. Longer detachable power-supply cords or extension cords are available and may be used if care is exercised in their use. If a longer detachable power-supply cord or extension cord is used, (1) the marked electrical rating of the extension cord should be at least as great as the electrical rating of the appliance, and (2) the longer cord should be arranged so that it will not drape over the counter top or table top where it can be pulled on by children or tripped over unintentionally.
Filets de sole aux tomates
2 c. th dhuile dolive ou de vin rouge (facultatif) 2 petits oignons, en ds 2 gousses dail, minces 2 petites tomates, haches 2 c. table de basilic frais (ou 1/2 c. th de basilic sch) 1 c. table de persil frais, hach 1 c. table de poivre moulu 1 c. table de jus de citron 1 lb de filet de sole (ou dautre poisson chair blanche) Prchauffez le gril pendant minutes. Faites sauter les oignons et lail dans de lhuile ou du vin pendant 2 minutes en remuant de temps en temps. Ajoutez les tomates, la moiti des fines herbes et un peu de poivre. Dposez le poisson par-dessus et ajoutez le jus de citron et le restant des fines herbes. Couvrez et laissez cuire pendant minutes. Dposez le poisson et les lgumes dans un plat. Si du jus de cuisson sest coul dans le bac dgouttement, versez-le sur le poisson. Servez avec du pain frais ou du riz. Donne portions.

CAUTION: To prevent Plasticizers to migrate from the finish of the counter top or table top or other furniture, place NON-PLASTIC coasters or place-mats between the appliance and the finish of the counter top or table top. Failure to do so may cause the finish to darken, permanent blemishes may occur or stains can appear.

How To Use

Grillade de lgumes
6 tranches daubergines de 1/2 po dpaisseur (ou 2 petites aubergines) 2 petits oignons, en tranches de 1/2 po 2 petites tomates, en ds 2 petits zucchinis, en tranches 4 grosses gousses dail, peles et tranches champignons, tranchs 1 c. th dhuile dolive (facultatif) Prchauffez le gril pendant minutes. tendez lhuile dolive ce moment si dsir. Ajoutez les tranches daubergine et lail, couvrez et cuisez 3 minutes. Ajoutez les tranches doignon, de zucchini et de champignon. Couvrez et cuisez minutes. Retirez les tranches daubergine, de zucchini et de champignons et placez-les sur une assiette. Sur le gril, ajoutez les tomates aux oignons et lail. Couvrez et cuisez pendant une minute. Retirez et dposez sur les tranches daubergine, de zucchini et de champignons. Donne portions. Pour accompagner la viande et les ptes ou pour garnir un pain pita ou un sandwich au pain franais.
George Foremans Lean Mean Fat Reducing Grilling Machine
1. Before using the Grilling Machine for the first time, wipe the Grilling Plates with a damp cloth to remove all dust. 2. To preheat: Close the Lid and plug cord into a 120V AC outlet. The Power Light will go on indicating that the elements are heating. Allow Grilling Machine to preheat for 3-5 minutes. 3. Use a "pot holder" to carefully open the Lid. 4. Slide the grease catching Drip Tray under the front of the unit. 5. Carefully place the items to be cooked on the bottom cooking plate. 6. Close the Lid and allow the food to cook for the desired time. (Consult the Recipe Section at the back of this book for some suggestions.) The Power Light will go on when the Lid is closed to indicate that the elements are heating up to cook. Do not leave appliance unattended during use! 7. After the desired amount of time, the food should be done. 8. Use a "pot holder" to carefully open the Lid. 9. Remove the food using the Plastic Spatula provided. Be sure to always use either plastic or wooden utensils so as not to scratch the non-stick surface. Never use metal tongs, forks or knives as these can damage the coating on the cooking plates. 10. Disconnect the plug from the wall outlet and allow to cool. CAUTION: To avoid any sparks at the outlet while disconnecting plug, make sure the "Power Light" is off (not illuminated) before disconnecting the plug from the outlet. 11. When cool, the Drip Tray may be removed and emptied. Be sure the liquid is cooled before removing Drip Tray.

Recipes

NOTE: For all recipes, please remember to place Drip Tray in front of the Grilling Machine to catch drippings from the cooking process.

Petit djeuner texan

Un petit djeuner pic comme on les aime dans le sud-ouest. Ces steakettes sont dlicieuses avec des lgumes sauts ou avec des oeufs brouills et de la salsa maison. Pour liminer le maximum de gras, choisissez du boeuf hach maigre 90%. Le boeuf maigre 90% contient 9 g de gras dont 4 g de gras saturs ; tandis que le boeuf maigre 73% contient 18 g de gras dont 7 g de gras saturs. 1 blanc doeuf lgrement battu 1/3 tasse doignon finement hach 1/4 tasse de chapelure assaisonne 1/4 tasse de piment fort vert coup en ds 1 gousse dail (grosse), mince 2 c. table de cilantro frais coup 1 c. table de vinaigre de cidre 1-1/2 c. th de chili en poudre 1/4 c. th de sel marin 1/8 c. th de poivre de cayenne 1/2 lb de boeuf hach maigre Dans un bol de taille moyenne, mlangez le blanc doeuf, loignon, la chapelure, le piment fort, lail, le cilantro, le vinaigre, le chili, le sel et le poivre de cayenne. Ajoutez le boeuf hach et mlangez bien. Avec le mlange, faites huit steakettes de 3 pouces de diamtre. Prchauffez le gril pendant minutes et placez les steakettes sur la plaque, quatre la fois. En la retournant une ou deux fois, laissez cuire la viande 5 minutes ou jusqu ce quelle ne soit plus rose et que le jus de cuisson soit transparent. Donne 8 steakettes. Cette recette est extraite de The Healthy Gourmet (Clarkson Potter) de Cherie Calborn.
The Champs Sausage Without Guilt
You can start your day with a sizzling sausage patty that not only tastes good, but is also good for you. This moist, flavorful sausage, served with a country-style biscuit, makes the complete breakfast. Choose ground turkey breast, which is lower in fat than ground turkey containing dark meat and skin. Turkey, especially the light meat, is a good source of niacin, which is an important B vitamin needed to maintain a healthy nervous system. 1 slightly beaten egg white 1/3 cup finely chopped onion 1/4 cup finely snipped dried apples or 1/2 cup finely chopped fresh red Delicious apple 1/4 cup seasoned bread crumbs 2 Tbsp. snipped fresh parsley 1/2 tsp. sea salt 1/2 tsp. ground sage 1/4 tsp. ground nutmeg 1/4 tsp. black pepper 1/8 tsp. cayenne pepper 1/2 lb.lean ground turkey breast In a medium size mixing bowl, combine the egg white, onion, dried or fresh apples, bread crumbs, parsley, salt, sage, nutmeg, black pepper, and cayenne pepper. Add the ground turkey and mix well. Shape the mixture into eight or nine 2-inch wide patties. Preheat the Grilling Machine and place the patties on the grill four at a time. Cook for 5 minutes or until the meat is no longer pink and the juices run clear, turning once or twice. Yield: 8 - 9 patties This recipe is from "The Healthy Gourmet" (Clarkson Potter) by Cherie Calbom.

George Foremans PowerBurger
A flavorful hamburger that we think tastes even better than its all-meat cousin! It pays to eat meals that minimize meat. To reduce saturated fat in a typical burger, you can cut back on the amount of meat and make up for it with plant-based ingredients. Bread crumbs and chopped vegetables have been added in this recipe. You could also try cooked rice, other grains or cereal. In addition, choose whole wheat buns; they typically contain one less fat gram than regular or even reduced-calorie buns. If you settle for nothing less than a cheeseburger, Swiss cheese is 1 gram lower in fat than Cheddar, American or Monterey Jack with 8 grams of fat versus 9 in each ounce of cheese. However, reduced fat cheeses like Cheddar or Swiss contain half the fat with 4 grams per ounce. Mustard contains 1 gram of fat per tablespoon versus a whopping 11 grams of fat in a tablespoon of mayonnaise. Top your burger in healthful style with dark, leafy green lettuce, shredded cabbage, fresh cilantro, basil or spinach. 1/4 cup chopped vegetables such as yellow onions, green onions, zucchini, parsley (can be sauted) 1/4 cup seasoned bread crumbs 3/4 lb. lean ground beef In a medium-size mixing bowl, combine the vegetables and bread crumbs. Add the ground beef and mix well. Shape the mixture into four 4-inch wide patties. Preheat the Grilling Machine for 3 - 5 minutes and place the patties on the grill four at a time. Cook for 5 - 6 minutes or until the meat is no longer pink and the juices run clear, turning once. Yield: Serves 4 This recipe is from The Healthy Gourmet (Clarkson Potter) by Cherie Calbom.

Instructions dentretien

ATTENTION: Pour viter des brlures, laisser refroidir le gril compltement avant de le nettoyer. 1. Avant de nettoyer lappareil, laissez-le refroidir aprs avoir dbranch le cordon lectrique de la prise murale. 2. Nettoyage intrieur: Placez le bac dgouttement sous lavant de lappareil. laide de la spatule en plastique, enlevez tous rsidus de graisse et daliment sur les plaques de cuisson. Essuyez ces dernires avec du papier essuie-tout ou une ponge. Les rsidus tomberont dans le bac dgouttement. 3. Rsidus tenaces: Essuyez les plaques avec une ponge humide pendant que le gril est encore lgrement chaud. 4. Videz le bac dgouttement et nettoyez-le leau chaude savonneuse, puis essuyez-le. 5. Nettoyage extrieur: Passez une ponge avec un peu deau chaude sur lappareil, puis essuyez-le avec un torchon doux et sec. 6. Ne jamais utiliser de laine dacier, de tampons rcurer ni de produits abrasifs pour nettoyer le gril. 7. Ne jamais plonger lappareil dans de leau ni dans aucun autre liquide.

VEUILLEZ CONSERVER CES INSTRUCTIONS

MANUEL DUTILISATION

Modle GR30/GR30CB
ONE-YEAR LIMITED WARRANTY
This Salton, Inc. product warranty extends to the original consumer purchaser of the product. Warranty Duration: This product is warranted to the original consumer purchaser for a period of one (1) year from the original purchase date. Warranty Coverage: This product is warranted against defective materials or workmanship. This warranty is void if the product has been damaged by accident, in shipment, unreasonable use, misuse, neglect, improper service, commercial use, repairs by unauthorized personnel or other causes not arising out of defects in materials or workmanship. This warranty is effective only if the product is purchased and operated in the USA and Canada, and does not extend to any units which have been used in violation of written instructions furnished by Salton, Inc., or to units which have been altered or modified or to damage to products or parts thereof which have had the serial number removed, altered, defaced or rendered illegible. Warranty Disclaimers: This warranty is in lieu of all warranties expressed or implied and no representative or person is authorized to assume for Salton, Inc. any other liability in connection with the sale of our products. There shall be no claims for defects or failure of performance or product failure under any theory of tort, contract or commercial law including, but not limited to, negligence, gross negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty and breach of contract. Salton, Inc. is not responsible or liable for indirect, special or consequential damages arising out of or in connections with the use or performance of the product or other damages with respect to loss of property, or loss of revenues or profit. Warranty Performance: During the above one-year warranty period, a product with a defect will be either repaired or replaced with a reconditioned comparable model (at Salton, Inc.'s option) when the product is returned to the Salton, Inc. facility. The repaired or replacement product will be in warranty for the balance of the one-year warranty period and an additional one-month period. No charge will be made for such repair or replacement.

Service and Repair

Should the appliance malfunction, you should first call toll-free 1-800-233-9054 between the hours of 8:00 am and 5:00 pm Central Standard Time and ask for CONSUMER SERVICE. Please refer to model GR30/GR30CB when you call. In-Warranty Service (USA) for an appliance covered under the warranty period, no charge is made for service or postage. Contact Consumer Service for return authorization. In-Warranty Service (Canada) for an appliance covered under the warranty period, no charge is made for service or postage. Please return the product insured, packaged with sufficient protection, and postage and insurance prepaid to the address listed below. Customs duty/brokerage fee, if any, must be paid by the consumer. Out-of- Warranty Service: A flat rate charge by model is made for out-of-warranty service. Include $10.00 (U.S.) for return shipping and handling. Salton, Inc. cannot assume responsibility for loss or damage during incoming shipment. For your protection, carefully package the product for shipment and insure it with the carrier. Be sure to enclose the following items with your appliance: any accessories related to your problem; your full return address and daytime phone number; a note describing the problem you experienced; a copy of your sales receipt or other proof of purchase to determine warranty status. C.O.D. shipments cannot be accepted. Return the appliance to: ATTN: Repair Department, Salton, Inc. 708 South Missouri St. Macon, MO 63552 For more information on Salton/MAXIM products: visit our website: http://www.salton-maxim.com, or you can email us at: salton@saltonusa.com Printed in China 2000 Salton, Inc. P/N# 60550ESF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK STATE OF NEW YORK, by ATTORNEY GENERAL ELIOT SPITZER, STATE OF ILLINOIS, by ATTORNEY GENERAL JAMES E. RYAN, STATE OF ALABAMA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL PRYOR, STATE OF ALASKA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL BRUCE M. BOTELHO, STATE OF ARIZONA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL JANET NAPOLITANO, STATE OF ARKANSAS, by ATTORNEY GENERAL MARK PRYOR, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL LOCKYER, STATE OF COLORADO, by ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN SALAZAR, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, by ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, STATE OF DELAWARE, by ATTORNEY GENERAL M. JANE BRADY, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, by INTERIM CORPORATION COUNSEL ARABELLA W. TEAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED No. 02 Civ. 7096 (LTS) AMENDED COMPLAINT
STATE OF GEORGIA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL THURBERT E. BAKER, STATE OF HAWAII, by ATTORNEY GENERAL EARL I. ANZAI, STATE OF IDAHO, by ATTORNEY GENERAL ALAN G. LANCE, STATE OF INDIANA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVEN CARTER, STATE OF IOWA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL TOM MILLER, STATE OF KANSAS, by ATTORNEY GENERAL CARLA J. STOVALL, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, by ATTORNEY GENERAL ALFRED B. CHANDLER III,: STATE OF LOUISIANA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARD P. IEYOUB, STATE OF MAINE, by ATTORNEY GENERAL G. STEVEN ROWE, STATE OF MARYLAND, by ATTORNEY GENERAL J. JOSEPH CURRAN, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, by ATTORNEY GENERAL THOMAS F. REILLY? STATE OF MICHIGAN, by ATTORNEY GENERAL JENNIFER GRANHOLM, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, by ATTORNEY GENERAL MIKE MOORE, STATE OF MONTANA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHAEL MCGRATH,
STATE OF NEBRASKA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL DON STENBERG, STATE OF NEVADA, by. GENERAL FRANKIE SUE DEL PAPA, ATTORNEY STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, by ATTORNEY GENERAL PHILIP T. MCLAUGHLIN, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, by ATTORNEY GENERAL DAVID SAMSON, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL ROY COOPER, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL WAYNE STENEJHEM, STATE OF OHIO, by ATTORNEY GENERAL BETTY D. MONTGOMERY, : STATE OF OKLAHOMA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL W. A. DREW EDMONSON, STATE OF OREGON, by ATTORNEY GENERAL HARDY MYERS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL D. MICHAEL FISHER, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, by ATTORNEY GENERAL ANNABELLE RODRIQUEZ,: STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by ATTORNEY GENERAL SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL CHARLES M. CONDON, STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL MARK BARNETT,
STATE OF TENNESSEE, by ATTORNEY GENERAL PAUL G. SUMMERS, STATE OF TEXAS, by ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN CORNYN, STATE OF UTAH, by ATTORNEY GENERAL MARK L. SHURTLEFF, STATE OF VERMONT, by ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM H. SORRELL, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL JERRY W. KILGORE, STATE OF WASHINGTON, by ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE,: STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, by ATTORNEY GENERAL DARRELL V. MCGRAW, STATE OF WISCONSIN, by ATTORNEY GENERAL JAMES E. DOYLE, STATE OF WYOMING, by ATTORNEY GENERAL HOKE MACMILLAN, Plaintiffs, v. SALTON, INC., Defendant.
__________________________________________x
The Plaintiff States of NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARIZONA,
ARKANSAS, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, FLORIDA,. GEORGIA, HAWAII, IDAHO, INDIANA, IOWA, KANSAS,, LOUISIANA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MICHIGAN, MISSISSIPPI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, NEVADA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, OREGON, RHODE ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, TENNESSEE, TEXAS, UTAH, VERMONT, WASHINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN, and WYOMING, the Commonwealths of KENTUCKY, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA, PUERTO RICO and VIRGINIA, and the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (the "States" or "Plaintiffs") allege as follows :
The States bring this action under the antitrust laws of the United States and of the States, and/or the consumer protection and unfair competition laws of the States, to recover damages suffered by the States' consumers resulting from an illegal resale price maintenance, exclusive dealing and monopolization scheme orchestrated by Salton, Inc. ("Salton"), and implemented, in whole or in part, through combinations or agreements with others. The purpose of this unlawful activity was to maintain artificially inflated prices for Salton's George ForemanTM contact grills ("George Foreman Grills" or "GF Grills") by preventing retailers from discounting and by excluding rivals from the marketplace.
INTRODUCTION 2. "Contact grills" are hinged, two-surfaced electric cooking appliances, which cook food on

both sides simultaneously when the two surfaces are closed. Contact grills may also permit excess grease to be drained away from the food into a receptacle. In recent years, contact grills have rapidly become one ofthe most sought-after kitchen appliances in the. 3. United States. Salton dominates the market for contact grills. In order to maintain its monopoly power in this market, and to insure that its grills are sold at artificially inflated prices, Salton has engaged, and continues to engage, in various anti-competitive practices. 4. Beginning at least asearly as 1997, Salton established and announced minimum prices, below which it has not allowed its retailers to sell its mid-sized (GR20 or GR26), and large (GR30 or GR36) GF Grills, and other GF models. Salton's minimum price policy forbids retailers from selling these grills below the price at which Salton sells the products directly on the Internet or via infomercials broadcast on television. Some retailers who believed they could profitably sell these grills for lower prices attempted. to do so. When a retailer charged below Salton's minimum price, however. Salton suspended that retailer's shipments ofGF Grills for a limited period. Either before or during the suspension period, Salton further informed the retailer that Salton would refuse to supply George Foreman Grills in the future ifthe retailer again sold below the resale prices set by Salton. Upon receiving a commitment from the suspended retailer to price as Salton demanded, Salton reinstated the retailer. Salton thereby unlawfully fixed the prices at which retailers resold its GF Grills. 5. At the same time that Salton denied consumers the benefits ofunrestrained price competition on its own grills, it also restricted consumer access to contact grills of equal or
superior quality, and/or of lower or equivalent price, manufactured or sold by competitors. Salton generally forbids its retailers from selling contact grills other than its own, and suspended sales of its GF Grills to retailers who refused to abide by Salton's exclusivity restrictions. In view ofthe popularity of George Foreman Grills - and the substantial retail margins that Salton established via its illegal resale price restrictions - few retailers were willing to challenge Salton's exclusionary actions. Thus, Salton unlawfully foreclosed competitors from reaching a significant portion of the contact grill market and denied consumers the full range of choices in products and prices to which they were entitled by law. 6. These anti-competitive practices: (a) prevented and continue to prevent consumers from purchasing lower-priced contact grills ; (b) denied and continue to deny consumers access to a wider variety of marketplace options; and (c) hindered and continue to hinder competitors from selling products of equal or greater quality, or of equal or lower price. By this action, the States seek recompense for these injuries on behalf oftheir consumers, and injunctive relief to prevent Salton from continuing to engage in, or from returning to, such misconduct in the future.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7. This action arises under 1 and 2 ofthe Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1 and 2, and 3, 4c and 16 ofthe Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 14, 15c and 26. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' claims under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1337. 8. This complaint also alleges violations of state antitrust, unfair competition, and/or
consumer protection laws, and seeks damages, restitution, injunctive relief, civil penalties and related relief under those state laws. This Court has jurisdiction over those claims under 28 U.S.C. 1367 and the principles of supplemental jurisdiction. The federal and state law claims arise from a common nucleus ofoperative facts, and the entire suit commenced by this Complaint constitutes a single action that would ordinarily be tried in one judicial proceeding. The exercise of supplemental jurisdiction will avoid duplication and a multiplicity of actions, and will promote the interests ofjudicial economy, convenience and fairness. 9. This Court further has personal jurisdiction over Salton under 15 U.S.C. 22 and N.Y. C.P.L.R. 302(a). Salton has: (a) transacted business in New York State; (b) committed tortious acts within the state; and/or (c) committed tortious acts without the state causing injury within the state. The claims alleged in this Complaint arise out of such business or tortious acts. 10. Venue in this district is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), (c) and (d), 15 U.S.C. 22 and N.Y. C.P.L.R. 503 and 505.
THE PARTIES 11. Plaintiff States bring this action in their sovereign capacity, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons for. whom the States may act, as parenspatriae on behalf oftheir States' citizens, economy and general welfare, and/or as otherwise authorized by law, to enforce federal and state antitrust laws, to recover damages sustained by natural persons residing in their respective States as a result of Salton's illegal anti-competitive conduct; and to
secure appropriate equitable relief. 12. Defendant Salton, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws ofDelaware, with its principal place ofbusiness in Mount Prospect, Illinois. Salton transacts business - and/or Salton's products are sold - in each ofthe Plaintiff States and throughout the United States generally.

CO-CONSPIRATORS 13. Various firms, persons, corporations and other business entities, known and unknown to the States and not named as defendants, including without limitation unnamed retailers and wholesalers, have participated as co-conspirators with Salton in the violations alleged
in this Complaint, and have performed acts in furtherance thereof.
PRODUCT AND GEOGRAPHIC MARKETS 14. The product market in this case is the market for retail sales of contact grills. There are no close substitutes for such products that are reasonably interchangeable. 15. 16. The geographic market in this case is the United States. During the period beginning at least as early as 1997 and continuing to the present, Salton has dominated the retail market for contact grills, with a market share substantially in excess of 50%.
TRADE AND COMMERCE 17. Salton is engaged in the business ofdeveloping, arranging for the manufacture of,
distributing and selling a variety of houseware products, ranging from small electrical appliances to fine china. Among other items, Salton distributes the George Foreman
At all times pertinent to this Complaint, Salton sold George Foreman Grills to consumers throughout the United States, both directly over the Internet and on television, and through
Salton's GF Grills were transported across state lines and were sold in the Plaintiff States by both Salton and such wholesalers and retailers.
Salton's George Foreman contact grills were marketed, promoted and sold in interstate commerce throughout the United States.
The activities of Salton and its co-conspirators -- including marketing, promoting, receiving, distributing and selling contact grill products -- were in the regular, continuous and substantial flow ofinterstate commerce and have had, and do have, a substantial effect
ANTI-COMPETITIVE CONDUCT Salton's Resale Price Maintenance Scheme 22. Commencing at least as early as 1997, Salton took steps to restrain competition in the sale of contact grills and to fix, stabilize or maintain the resale prices of its George Foreman Grills at artificially high levels. To accomplish this, Salton announced to its retailers that it would suspend shipments to them ifthey sold GF Grills below its "minimum advertised price" ("MAP price"). The MAP price was, for any particular Salton product, generally 10

identical to the price that Salton itself charged customers for the same product in direct retail sales via the Internet and television infomercials. 23. The products subject to Salton's minimum pricing policy included certain George Foreman Grills. Specifically, the GR20 had a MAP price of$59.99 and the GR30 had a MAP price of $99.99.' These models were later replaced by the GR26 and GR36, respectively, which retained the same MAP prices. Salton has added other GF Grill models to its list of MAP products. 24. From time to time, information came to Salton's attention that a retailer who purchased Salton's products - either directly from Salton or through a wholesaler or retailer to whom Salton sold - was. offering Salton's products for sale at prices below Salton's MAP prices. Salton often obtained such information about retailer prices from complaints by other retailers, and Salton told complaining retailers about specific steps that it took, intended to take, or was taking to have discounting retailers adhere to Salton's MAP prices. 25. When Salton learned that a retailer was offering its GF grills below Salton's MAP price, Salton suspended the retailer from receiving that product for a limited period. Salton also told its wholesalers that it would suspend them if one of the retailers to which they provided GF Grills offered those products at retail below Salton's MAP price. 26. Before or during each such suspension, Salton-engaged in discussions with the suspended retailer. In these discussions, Salton stated, in words or substance, the retail prices at which its George Foreman contact grills had to be resold, and that it would refuse to
'The line of George Foreman Grills consists ofdifferent size products, identified by the letters "GR,"and a number, indicating the grill's diameter in inches.
resume shipments or would terminate future shipments ifthe retailer were to discount GF Grills again. 27. In virtually all instances, the suspended retailer told Salton, in words or substance, that it would re-sell the grills at the MAP prices set by Salton. After the retailer made such a commitment, Salton resumed shipments at the end ofthe suspension period. Through this practice, Salton coerced its retailers into agreements to fix the retail prices ofGF Grills, and achieved their adherence to Salton's pricing requirements by means beyond mere refusal to deal. 28. From 1998 through the present, Salton has suspended numerous retailers, thereby coercing them to agree to sell at the price demanded by Salton. 29. Salton also informed retailers when it suspended one of their competitors who offered Salton's GF Grills for sale at prices below Salton's announced MAP prices, and the steps the retailer took to adhere to Salton's demands: Salton communicated these suspensions to drive home to other retailers the consequences of failing to adhere to Salton's pricing requirements, and with the intent that those other retailers would continue to price accordance with Salton's demands. Because many retailers monitor and match competitors' prices as a matter of policy or practice, Salton's agreement with one retailer on price maintained the prices ofnumerous other retailers as well. Virtually all major retailers have priced, and continue to price, at the levels required by Salton. 30. Salton's policy also coerced agreements from those retailers that were not subject to suspensions. Salton told all its retailers that its MAP prices were mandatory, and that they faced a suspension of GF Grill shipments ifthey did not comply with the resale prices 12

established by Salton. 31. In these ways, Salton: (a) reached agreements on price with its retailers ; (b) coerced retailers to set specific prices by means beyond a mere refusal to deal; and (c) intentionally caused other retailers to maintain their prices at the levels demanded by Salton - all with the intent and effect that those retailers adhere to Salton's MAP prices. Consumers were injured accordingly.
Exclusive Dealing and Monopolization 32. In addition to orchestrating a resale price maintenance scheme, Salton excluded rival contact grill products from important retail distribution channels. Salton accomplished this by adopting and communicating a policy prohibiting retailers from selling its rivals' contact grills. 33. Those retailers who sold contact grills made or distributed by Salton's rivals often suffered the same fate as those who discounted the GF Grills: Salton threatened to withhold or actually withheld future shipments of its own product unless the dealer ceased to offer the rival grill. As a result of this activity, Salton's competitors have been excluded from key distribution channels, as those who have stocked rival products capitulated to Salton's demand for exclusivity. In this manner, Salton has successfully foreclosed to its competitors a substantial portion of the outlets available to sell contact grills at retail. 34. Some retailers also declined to sell contact grills made by Salton's rivals because Salton had conveyed the message that such sales would jeopardize future shipments of the GF Grills. 13
Salton's policy substantially restricted distribution channels available for other contact grills, and diminished the incentive of competitors to invest. in product development and advertising.
The anti-competitive impact of Salton's price restrictions was magnified by these exclusivity policies. Because Salton's efforts restricted the ability of competitors to enter the market, there was little inter-brand competition to constrain Salton's artificial inflation of prices via its resale price maintenance scheme on GF Grills. Again, consumers in the Plaintiff States were harmed.
THE EFFECTS OF SALTON'S ILLEGAL CONDUCT 37. Salton's acts and practices, undertaken in conjunction with its co-conspirators, had the purpose or effect, or the tendency or capacity, unreasonably to restrain trade and to injure competition within and throughout the United States, by: (a) Establishing a regime ofresale price maintenance, which restricted independent retailer pricing ofcontact grills, and which deprived consumers of the benefits of an unrestrained competitive market; (b) Coercing retailers into selling contact grills at prices above those that the retailers otherwise would have set in exercising their independent business judgment ; (c) Coordinating efforts by retailers of contact grills to stop discounting by their competitors; (d) Raising the prices that consumers had to pay for contact grills above their 14

competitive level; (e) Depriving consumers of the opportunity to choose among contact grills. manufactured or sold by competing suppliers, including those ofequivalent or superior quality, and/or those ofequal or lower price; and (f) Excluding competitors and potential competitors from significant portions of the contact grill market, thereby precluding other manufacturers or sellers from providing consumers with alternatives to the George Foreman Grills.
FIRST CLAIM: CONSPIRACY IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1 OF THE SHERMAN ACT 38. 39. The Plaintiff States repeat the allegations in paragraphs 1 through the preceding paragraph. Since at least as early as 1997, Salton and its co-conspirators have engaged in continuing. unlawful contracts, combinations or conspiracies in unreasonable restraint of interstate trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 ofthe Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1. 40. The combinations, contracts and conspiracies consisted of, among other things, express or implied agreements between Salton and its dealers to set the resale price for George Foreman Grill models GR20, GR26, GR30 and GR36, as well as other models, and to exclude rival contact grills from significant channels ofdistribution. 41. Salton also has entered into continuing unlawful contracts, combinations and conspiracies by coercing dealers of the George Foreman Grills to set retail prices at the level at which Salton sold these Grills directly to retail customers (i.e., end users). 42. As a result of this unlawful conduct, natural person consumers residing in the Plaintiff 15
States have paid higher prices for contact grills than they would have paid absent Salton's anti-competitive acts, and consumers were deprived of a full, competitive range of choices. 43. The actions of Salton and its co-conspirators are aper se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Alternatively, the anti-competitive effects of these actions outweigh their pro-competitive benefits, if any, and thus Salton's conduct is illegal under the Rule of Reason.
SECOND CLAIM: MONOPOLIZATION OF THE MARKET FOR CONTACT GRILLS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 2 OF THE SHERMAN ACT 44. 45. The Plaintiff States repeat the allegations in paragraphs 1 through the preceding paragraph. Salton engaged in exclusionary, anti-competitive conduct designed to prevent competition on the merits between itselfand its competitors in the market for contact grills sold at retail to end user consumers. In summary, Salton has : (a) informed retailers and wholesalers that it will not sell its George Foreman Grills to anyone that markets a competitive grill; (b) suspended retailers (including cancelling product already on order) who sell or offer to sell both Salton products and products of Salton's competitors; and (c) coordinated agreements on resale price which illegally increased retailer margins on GF Grills, and diminished retailers' incentives to challenge Salton's exclusivity requirements. 46. These policies excluded competing manufacturers and/or sellers from a substantial share of the distribution channels for contact grills sold at retail to end user consumers. 47. These acts were intended to, and did, enable Salton to acquire and/or maintain monopoly 16

The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of Arizona Uniform State Antitrust Act 44-1401 et seq.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Ark. Code Ann. 4=88-101 et seq.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of California's Cartwright Act, California Business & Professional Code 16720 et seq., and California's Unfair Competition Act, California Business & Professional Code 17200 et seq.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation ofthe Colorado Antitrust Act of 1992, 4-4-101 C.R.S. (2002).
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation ofthe Connecticut Antitrust Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. 35-24 et seq. and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act. The defendant's course of conduct has been undertaken in the conduct of trade or commerce as.defined in Conn. Gen. Stat. 42-110a(4), and the defendant's acts and practices constitute unfair acts or practices in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. 42-110b(a).
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Delaware Antitrust Act, 6 Delaware Code Chapter 21, and Delaware's Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 6 Delaware Code, Subchapter 111, 2532.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of District of Columbia Antitrust Act, D.C. Code Ann. 28-4502.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of Chapter 542, Florida Statutes (the Florida Antitrust Act of 1980) and Chapter 501, Part II, Florida 19
Statutes (the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act). The violations of section 501.204, Florida Statutes have occurred in or affected, and are occurring in or affecting, more than one judicial circuit ofthe State of Florida. 69. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation ofOfficial Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA) 13-8-2. 70. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes 480-1 et seq. 71. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Idaho Competition Act, Idaho Code 48-101 et seq. 72. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of Indiana Code 24-1-1-1 et seq. 73. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Iowa Competition Act, Iowa Code 553.1 et seq. and the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act, Iowa Code 714.16. 74. ".
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Kansas Restraint of Trade Act, Kansas Statutes Annotated 50-101 et seq. and its predecessor: '

The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act KRS 367.175.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of Louisiana Revised Statutes .51 :121, et seq., and 51 :1405.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of 10 Maine Rev. Stat. 1101 and 1102, and in intentional violation of5 Maine Rev. Stat. 205-A 'et 20
seq. 78. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Maryland Antitrust Act, Md. Com. Law Code Ann. 11-201 et seq. 79. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, Mass. Gen. L. c. 93 A 1 et seq. and the Massachusetts Antitrust Act, Mass. Gen. L. c. et seq. 80. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Michigan Antitrust Reform Act, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. 445.771 et seq. 81. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Mississippi Code Annotated 75-21-1 et seq. and 75-24-1, et seq. (1972, as amended). 82. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of Montana Code Ann. 30-14-205. 83. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of Nebraska Rev. Stat. Consumer 59-801 - 59-831 and 59-1601 - 59-1623. 84. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation ofthe Nevada Unfair Trade Practice Act, NRS Chapter 598A. 85. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation ofthe New Hampshire RSA 356. 86. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the New Jersey Stat. Ann., title 56, ch. 9, 56:9-1 et seq. 87. The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of North Carolina General Statutes 75-1, 75-1.1, 75-2 and 75-2.1. 21
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of North Dakota's Uniform Antitrust Act, N.D. Cent. Code 51-08.1-01 et seq.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of Ohio Antitrust Law, Ohio Revised Code 109.81 and 1331.01 et seq.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of Oklahoma Statutes 79 O.S. 1 et seq.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of Oregon Revised Statutes 646.705 et seq.
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of71 Pennsylvania Statutes 732-204(c).
The aforementioned acts and practices by Salton were and are in violation of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Monopolies and Restraint ofTrade Act, T. 10 L.P.R.A. 257 et. seq., Act. June 25, 1964, No. 77, as amended.

competitor. H. Directing such other equitable reliefas may be necessary to redress Salton's violations of federal and state law; l. Awarding Plaintiffs their costs of this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees, and expert fees; and J. Granting such other and further relief as may be just and proper.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL The Plaintiff States demand a trial by jury for each and every issue triable ofright to a
Dated : New York, New York October 2, 2002 ELIOT SPITZER, Attorney General State of New York By:
L. HIMES (JLH 7714) Assistant Attorney General Chief, Antitrust Bureau STATE OF NEW YORK Office of the Attorney General 120 Broadway, Suite 2601 New York, New York 10271 (212) 416-8262
Of Counsel : LINDA J. GARGIULO DAVID A. WEINSTEIN JAMES YOON Assistant Attorneys General Antitrust Bureau
STATE OF ILLINOIS JAMES E. RYAN Attorney General Robert W. Pratt Chief, Antitrust Bureau Blake Harrop Assistant Attorney General 100 West Randolph Street Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 814-3772 STATE OF ALABAMA BILL PRYOR Attorney General Jeff Long Assistant Attorney General State House 11 S. Union Street Montgomery, AL 36130 (334) 242-7300 STATE OF ALASKA BRUCE M. BOTELHO Attorney General Julia Coster 1031 W. Fourth Avenue Anchorage, AK 99501 (907) 269-5230 STATE OF ARIZONA JANET NAPOLITANO Attorney General Timothy A. Nelson Special Counsel and Antitrust Unit Chief 1275 West Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85007 (602) 542-7752
STATE OF ARKANSAS MARK PRYOR Attorney General Teresa Brown Senior Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock, AK 72201 (501) 682-3561 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BILL LOCKYER Attorney General Barbara Motz Office of the Attorney General of California 300 South Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90013 STATE OF COLORADO KEN SALAZAR Attorney General Maria Berkenkotter Devin Laiho Assistant Attorneys General 1525 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 STATE OF CONNECTICUT RICHARD BLUMENTHAL Attorney General Steven M. Rutstein Rachel Davis Assistant Attorneys General 55 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 808-5540
STATE OF DELAWARE M. JANE BRADY Attorney General Marsha Kramarck Deputy Attorney General 820 N. French Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-6630 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ARABELLA W. TEAL Interim Corporation Counsel Don A. Resnikoff Assistant Corporation Counsel 441 4th Street, NW, Suite 1060N Washington, DC 20001 (202) 727-4170 STATE OF FLORIDA ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH Attorney General Patricia A. Conners Chief, Antitrust Section Eric Taylor Assistant Attorney General PL-01, The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050 (850) 414-3600 STATE OF GEORGIA THURBERT E. BAKER Attorney General Robin Cohen Assistant Attorney General 40 Capitol Square, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30334-1300 (404) 656-3300

STATE OF HAWAII EARL I. ANZAI Attorney General Rodney I. Kimura Deputy Attorney General 425 Queen Street Honolulu, HI 96813 (808) 586-1180 STATE OF IDAHO ALAN G. LANCE Attorney General Brett T. DeLange Deputy Attorney General P.O. Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0010 (208) 334-4114 STATE OF INDIANA STEVEN CARTER Attorney General Allen Pope Chief Counsel, Deputy Attorney General 402 W. Washington Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 (317) 232-6217 STATE OF IOWA TOM MILLER Attorney General John F. Dwyer Division of Consumer Advocate 310 Maple Street Des Moines, IA 50319 (515) 281-8414
STATE OF KANSAS CARLA J. STOVALL Attorney General Rex G. Beasley Assistant Attorney General 120 S. W. 10th Avenue, 4th Floor Topeka, KS 66612 (785) 296-3751 COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY ALFRED B. CHANDLER III Attorney General David Vandeventer Assistant Attorney General 1024 Capital Center Drive Frankfort, KY 40601 (502) 696-5389 STATE OF LOUISIANA RICHARD P. IEYOUB Attorney General Jane B. Johnson Assistant Attorney General P.O Box 94095 Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9095 (225) 342-2754 STATE OF MAINE G.STEVEN ROWE Attorney General John Brautigam Assistant Attorney General State House Building Station 6 Augusta, ME 04333 (207) 626-8867
STATE OF MARYLAND J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR. Attorney General Ellen S. Cooper Chief, Antitrust Division Andrew H. Levine Assistant Attorney General 200 St. Paul Street Baltimore, MD 21202 (410) 576-6470 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS THOMAS F. REILLY Attorney General Mary Freeley Assistant Attorney General One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2200 STATE OF MICHIGAN JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM Attorney General Paul F. Novak Assistant Attorney General Consumer Protection Division 525 West Ottawa 6th Floor, G. Mennen Williams Building Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 335-4809 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MIKE MOORE Attorney General Scott A. Johnson Special Assistant Attorney General P.O. Box 22947 Jackson, MS 39225 (601) 359-4230
STATE OF MONTANA MICHAEL MCGRATH Attorney General Cort Jensen Special Assistant Attorney General Montana Department of Administration 1424 9`h Avenue Helena, MT 59620 (406) 444-9680 STATE OF NEBRASKA DON STENBERG Attorney General Dale A. Comer Assistant Attorney General Nebraska Department of Justice 2115 State Capitol Lincoln, NE 68509-8920 (402) 471-2682 STATE OF NEVADA FRANKIE SUE DEL PAPA Attorney General Bureau of Consumer Protection Consumer Advocate Maria Martin-Kerr Deputy Attorney General 1000 E. William Street, Ste. 209 Carson City, NV 89701 (775) 687-6300 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PHILIP T. MCGLAUGHLIN Attorney General David Rienzo Assistant Attorney General 33 Capitol Street Concord, NH 03301 (603) 271-3643

STATE OF NEW JERSEY DAVID SAMSON Attorney General Robert Donaher Basil Merenda Deputy Attorneys General Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market St., P.O. Box 085 Trenton, NJ 08625 (609) 292-7497 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ROY COOPER Attorney General Kip Sturgis Assistant Attorney General North Carolina Department of Justice P.O. Box W. Edenton Street 2nd Floor Raleigh, NC 27602 (919) 716-6000 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA WAYNE STENEHJEM Attorney General Parrell D. Grossman Director, Consumer Protection/Antitrust State Capitol 600 E Boulevard Ave Dept 125 Bismarck ND 58505-0040 (701) 328-2811
STATE OF OHIO BETTY D. MONTGOMERY Attorney General Doreen C. Johnson Chief, Antitrust Section Jennifer L. Pratt Assistant Chief, Antitrust Section. 140 East Town Street 12th Floor Columbus, OH 43215 (614) 466-4328 STATE OF OREGON HARDY MYERS Attorney General Robert Roth Assistant Attorney General Oregon Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, OR 97301-4096 (503) 378-4732 STATE OF OKLAHOMA W. A. DREW EDMONSON Attorney General Debra Paz Assistant Attorney General 4545 N. Lincoln Blvd. Suite 260 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA D. MICHAEL FISHER Attorney General James A. Donahue III Chef Deputy Attorney General Antitrust Section Benjamin Cox Deputy Attorney General 14th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 (717) 787-4530
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO ANNABELLE RODRIQUEZ Irma Rodriguez Justiano Deputy Attorney General Luis D. Martinez-Rivera Special Prosecutor Post Office Box 9020192 San Juan, PR 00902-0192 (787) 723-7555 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SHELDON WHITEHOUSE Attorney General Jametta Alston Assistant Attorney General 150 South Main Street Providence, Rhode Island 02903 STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLES M. CONDON Attorney General C. Havird Jones, Jr. Senior Assistant Attorney General Rembert C. Dennis Building 1000 Assembly Street, Suite 501 Columbia, SC 29211-1549 (803) 734-3970 STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA MARK BARNETT Attorney General Jeffrey P. Hallem Assistant Attorney General 500 East Capitol Ave Pierre, SD 57501-5070 (605) 773-3215
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JERRY W. KILGORE Attorney General Sarah Oxenham Allen Assistant Attorney General Antitrust and Consumer Litigation Section 900 East Main Street Richmond, VA 23219 (804) 786-2116 STATE OF WASHINGTON CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE Attorney General Tina E. Kondo Chief, Antitrust Division Don Irby Assistant Attorney General Antitrust Division 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98164-1012 (206) 464-7744 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA DARRELL V. McGRAW, JR. Attorney General Jill L. Miles Deputy Attorney General Consumer Protection and Antitrust Division P.O. Box 1789 Charleston, WV 25326-1789 (304) 558-8986 STATE OF WISCONSIN JAMES E. DOYLE Attorney General Kevin J. O'Connor Assistant Attorney General Wisconsin Department of Justice P.O. Box 7857 Madison, WI 53707-7857 (608) 266-8986

STATE OF WYOMING HOKE MACMILLAN Attorney General Christopher Petrie Assistant Attorney General Office ofthe Attorney General of Wyoming 123 Capitol Building Cheyenne, WY 82002 (307) 777-5838