Contrast Ratio

Brightness cd/

Online Price

View Angle

Local Price

15 Pin

Sony KDL-32S2000 Sony KDL-V32XBR1 Sony KLV-32U100M Panasonic TC-32LE60 Panasonic TC-32LX60 Panasonic TC-32LX600 Panasonic TC-32LX50 Samsung LN-S3238D LN-S3241D Samsung LN-S3251D Samsung LN-S3252D Samsung LN-S3292D Samsung LN-S3296D Samsung LN-R329D Sharp LC-32D40U Sharps LC-40C32U Sharp Aquos LC-32D5U Sharp Aquos LC-32D6U Sharp Aquos LC-32GD6U Sharp Aquos LC-32D50U Toshiba P32LSA Toshiba32HL66 Toshiba32HLV66 Toshiba32HLV66 Mitsubishi LT-3280 NEC LCD3210BK Akai LCT3226 Soyo DYLT3260 Olevia LT32HV Olevia LT32HVM Olevia LT32HVE Maxent ML-32HLT21 Hisense TL3220 ViewSonic N3251w Vizio L32HDTV

32 AT AT 1300 NO

8ms 178 8ms
Commnets 150 31.0 Med wide gray bezal UPC: 32.Bd Cnet review - Dark Bezal Sony $126 31.No Color control 126 31.Inner blk >silver 126 Extra color processing 147 CnsmrRprt
AT 32 at AT 5000 AT AT AT AT 1200 NO 800 1600d 1600d 32 no Y no no no no AT AT 450 AT AT AT
170 8ms 178 8ms 6ms 176 6ms 176 6ms Y 1

na 170 146

Wide Blk Bez Silver Bez Blk Bez narrpwest Blk Bez
Black panel Gd online review Vry nar blk bez

6ms 12ms

Great Bez - 24 bit clr 135 135

8? 8ms 500 170

150 32.33.0 43

Case 5:10-cv-00185-DF Document 1
Filed 10/31/10 Page 1 of 9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION TEX PAT, LLC, Relator, v. (1) SHARP CORPORATION, (2) SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, (3) SHARP ELECTRONICS, MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., AND (4) SHARP ELECTRONICS OF CANADA LTD., Defendants.
Civil Action No. 5:10-CV-185

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR FALSE PATENT MARKING Relator Tex Pat, LLC (Relator) makes the following allegations against Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc., and Sharp Electronics of Canada Ltd. (collectively, Sharp or Defendant): NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a qui tam action for false patent marking under 35 U.S.C. 292. PARTIES 2. Relator is a Texas limited liability company having a principal place of business at 2300 Richmond, Suite 345, Houston, Texas 77098-3265. Relator has appointed Philip D. Racusin, 2300 Richmond Avenue, Suite 345, Houston, TX 77098-3265, as its agent for service of process. 3. On information and belief, Sharp Corporation is a Japanese corporation with its principal place of business at 22-22 Nagaike-cho, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8522, Japan.
Filed 10/31/10 Page 2 of 9
Sharp Corporation may be served at 22-22 Nagaike-cho, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8522, Japan, via an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process. 4. On information and belief, Sharp Electronics Corporation is a New York corporation with its principal place of business at Sharp Plaza, Mahwah, NJ 07495-1163. Sharp Electronics Corporation has appointed C T Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10011, as its agent for service of process. 5. On information and belief, Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 9295 Siempre Viva Road, Suite J2, San Diego, CA 92154. Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. has appointed C T Corporation System, 818 W. 7th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017, as its agent for service of process. 6. On information and belief, Sharp Electronics of Canada Ltd. is a Canadian corporation with its principal place of business at 335 Britannia Road East, Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 1W9, Canada. Sharp Electronics of Canada Ltd. may be served at 335 Britannia Road East, Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 1W9, Canada, via an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other person or entity authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a).
Filed 10/31/10 Page 3 of 9
8. Defendant is subject to this Courts specific and general personal jurisdiction pursuant to due process and/or the Texas Long Arm Statute, due at least to its substantial business in this Forum, including: (i) at least a portion of the false marking, affixing, or advertising alleged herein; and/or (ii) regularly doing or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent courses of conduct, and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods and/or services provided to individuals in Texas and in this District. 9. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), 1391(c), and 1395(a). Defendant has and/or continues (and/or has and continues to cause others) to transact business in this District, and has and/or continues (and/or has and continues to cause others) to mark upon, affix to, and/or use in advertising, in this District, the product(s) subject to this Complaint, which Defendant has and/or continues (and/or has and continues to cause others) to make, use, offer for sale, or sell in, and/or import into, this District. FACTS 10. Sharp has and/or continues (and/or has and continues to cause others) to mark upon, affix to, and/or use in advertising patents, including, by way of example only, U.S. Patent Nos. 4,577,216 (the 216 Patent), 4,631,603 (the 603 Patent), and 4,907,093 (the 093 Patent), true and correct copies of which are attached, as Exhibits A-C, respectively, in connection with Defendants products and/or related product packaging and advertisements, including, by way of example only, the BD-HP20U blu-ray disc player, LC-32D6U AQUOS television, LC-26D6U AQUOS television, LC-37D6U AQUOS television, LC-37DB5U liquid crystal television, LC-37D4U AQUOS television, LC-32D4U AQUOS television, LC-26D4U AQUOS television, SD-HX600 1-

Filed 10/31/10 Page 4 of 9
bit digital receiver with DVD, and DV-MX1U DVD player products, as illustrated in Exhibits D-J. 11. The 216 Patent (Exhibit A), which is titled Method and Apparatus for Modifying the Color Burst to Prohibit Videotape Recording, was filed in the United States on November 14, 1983 and issued on March 18, 1986. 12. The 216 Patent expired, at the very latest, on November 14, 2003. 13. When the 216 Patent expired, all future rights in that patent ceased to exist. 14. The 603 Patent (Exhibit B), which is titled Method and Apparatus for Processing a Video Signal so as to Prohibit the Making of Acceptable Video Tape Recordings Thereof, was filed in the United States on April 17, 1985 and issued on December 23, 1986. 15. The 603 Patent expired, at the very latest, on April 17, 2005. 16. When the 603 Patent expired, all future rights in that patent ceased to exist. 17. The 093 Patent (Exhibit C), which is titled Method and Apparatus for Preventing the Copying of a Video Program, was filed in the United States on November 1, 1988 and issued on March 6, 1990. The 093 Patent is a continuation of S/N 895,045, filed August 11, 1986. 18. The 093 Patent expired, at the very latest, on March 6, 2007. 19. Subsequent to expiration of the 603 Patent and the 093 Patent, Sharp has and/or continues (and/or has and/or continues to cause others)1 to mark upon, affix to, and/or use in advertising these patents in combination with its BD-HP20U blu-ray disc player products. See, e.g., Exhibit D (containing, in part, product instructions, which were
See Exhibit D (indicating document authored by Sharp Electronics).
Filed 10/31/10 Page 5 of 9
available on Sharps website at the time of filing of this Original Complaint,2 having a warranty revision date of December 16, 2005, an electronic creation date of September 11, 2007, a last modification date of February 15, 2008, and marking, affixing, and/or advertising the BD-HP20U blu-ray disc player products in combination with the 603 Patent and the 093 Patent). 20. Subsequent to expiration of the 603 Patent and the 216 Patent, Sharp has and/or continues (and/or has and/or continues to cause others)3 to mark upon, affix to, and/or use in advertising these patents in combination with its LC-37D6U AQUOS television, LC32D6U AQUOS television, and LC-26D6U AQUOS television products. See, e.g., Exhibit E (containing, in part, product instructions, having an electronic creation date of August 8, 2005, a last modification date of October 21, 2005, and marking, affixing, and/or advertising the LC-37D6U AQUOS television, LC-32D6U AQUOS television, and LC-26D6U AQUOS television products in combination with the 603 Patent and the 216 Patent); see also Exhibit F (containing, in part, product instructions, having an electronic creation date of August 8, 2005, a last modification date of August 31, 2005, and marking, affixing, and/or advertising the LC-37D6U AQUOS television, LC-32D6U AQUOS television, and LC-26D6U AQUOS television products in combination with the 603 Patent and the 216 Patent). 21. Subsequent to expiration of the 603 Patent and the 216 Patent, Sharp has and/or continues (and/or has and/or continues to cause others)4 to mark upon, affix to, and/or use in advertising these patents in combination with its LC-37DB5U liquid crystal television

Sharps website, accessed by entering the following search string into www.google.com: site:www.Sharpusa.com BD-HP20U (last accessed Oct. 30, 2010). 3 See Exhibit E (indicating document authored by Sharp Electronics); see also Exhibit F (indicating document authored by SHARP). 4 See Exhibit G (indicating document authored by Sharp Electronics).
Filed 10/31/10 Page 6 of 9
products. See, e.g., Exhibit G (containing product instructions, having an electronic creation date of August 1, 2005, a last modification date of October 19, 2005, and marking, affixing, and/or advertising the LC-37DB5U liquid crystal television products in combination with the 603 Patent and the 216 Patent). 22. Subsequent to expiration of the 603 Patent and the 216 Patent, Sharp has and/or continues (and/or has and/or continues to cause others)5 to mark upon, affix to, and/or use in advertising these patents in combination with its LC-37D4U AQUOS television, LC32D4U AQUOS television, and LC-26D4U AQUOS television products. See, e.g.,
Exhibit H (containing product instructions, having an electronic creation date of July 20, 2005, a last modification date of October 19, 2005, and marking, affixing, and/or advertising the LC-37D4U AQUOS television, LC-32D4U AQUOS television, and LC26D4U AQUOS television products in combination with the 603 Patent and the 216 Patent). 23. Subsequent to expiration of the 216 Patent, Sharp has and/or continues (and/or has and/or continues to cause others)6 to mark upon, affix to, and/or use in advertising these patents in combination with its SD-HX600 1-bit digital receiver with DVD television products. See, e.g., Exhibit I (containing product instructions, having an
electronic creation date of March 15, 2004, a last modification date of November 5, 2004, and marking, affixing, and/or advertising the SD-HX600 1-bit digital receiver with DVD television products in combination with the 216 Patent).
See Exhibit H (indicating document authored by Sharp Electronics). See Exhibit I (indicating document authored by Sharp Electronics).
Filed 10/31/10 Page 7 of 9
24. Subsequent to expiration of the 603 Patent, Sharp has and/or continues (and/or has and/or continues to cause others)7 to mark upon, affix to, and/or use in advertising these patents in combination with its DV-MX1U DVD player products. See, e.g., Exhibit J (containing product instructions, having an electronic creation date of August 5, 2005, a last modification date of December 2, 2005, and marking, affixing, and/or advertising the DV-MX1U DVD player products in combination with the 603 Patent). 25. Sharp is a large, sophisticated company. See, e.g., Exhibit K at p. 2 (containing, in part, Sharps 2010 Annual Report, indicating net sales of $29,955,957,000 for fiscal year 2010); id. at p. 6 (indicating Sharp is traded on Tokyo Stock Exchange). 26. Sharp has, and/or routinely retains, sophisticated legal counsel. See, e.g., Exhibit K at 25 (noting Sharp takes action to protect its patents, including filing lawsuits). 27. Sharp has decades of experience applying for, obtaining, licensing, and/or litigating patents. See, e.g., Exhibit K at p. 25 (providing that [a]s of March 31, 2010, Sharp had approximately 17,500 patents in Japan and 22,500 overseas). 28. Sharp knows, and at the very least reasonably should know, that the above patents do not cover any of the above Sharp products, or any products whatsoever. See, e.g., Exhibit K at p. 25 (We exercise care concerning the intellectual property.). 29. As a result of its false marking, Sharp has injured the United States Government, including its sovereign interest, and Sharps existent and potential competitors, as well as the general public, including Relatora member of the general public incurring the time and expense of enforcement. See, e.g., Exhibit K at p. 25 (In order to secure a

competitive edge. Sharp is aggressively promoting patent right obtainment.); id.
See Exhibit J (indicating document authored by Sharp Electronics).
Filed 10/31/10 Page 8 of 9
(Sharp utilizes these patents to strengthen its strategic business.); id. at 32 (declaring problems with its intellectual property can lead to Sharps competitive disadvantage). CLAIM 30. Relator incorporates paragraphs 129, as if fully set forth herein. Sharp has violated 35 U.S.C. 292 by falsely marking, affixing, and/or advertising its products, including the BD-HP20U blu-ray disc player, LC-32D6U AQUOS television, LC-26D6U AQUOS television, LC-37D6U AQUOS television, LC-37DB5U liquid crystal television, LC-37D4U AQUOS television, LC-32D4U AQUOS television, LC-26D4U AQUOS television, SD-HX600 1- bit digital receiver with DVD, and DV-MX1U DVD player products, with intent to deceive the public. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Relator respectfully requests that this Court enter: (a). A judgment in favor of Relator that Defendant has falsely marked items in violation of 35 U.S.C. 292; (b). A monetary award pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 292 in the form of a civil fine of $500 per falsely marked article, or an alternative amount, as set by the Court, one-half of any such award to be paid to the United States; (c). An accounting for any falsely marked articles not presented at trial and a monetary award set by the Court for such falsely marked articles; (d). An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interests on any monetary award; (e). An injunction prohibiting Defendant, and its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, licensees, successors, and assigns, and
Filed 10/31/10 Page 9 of 9
those in active concert or participation with any of them, from violating 35 U.S.C. 292; and (f). Any and all other relief, at law or equity, to which Relator may show itself to be entitled. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Relator, under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, requests a trial by jury of any issues so triable by right. Dated: October 31, 2010 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Hao Ni Hao Ni LEAD COUNSEL State Bar No. 24047205 Ni Law Firm PLLC 3102 Maple Avenue, Suite 400 Dallas, TX 75201 (214) 800-2208 hni@nilawfirm.com Tyler K. Brochstein State Bar No. 24059490 Brochstein Law Firm, PLLC 2820 McKinnon Street, Suite 4063 Dallas, TX 75201 (214) 444-3310 tyler@brochlaw.com Jack L. Siegel State Bar No. 24070621 Jack L. Siegel PLLC 3530 Travis Street, Suite 421 Dallas, TX 75204 (214) 699-1498 jack@jlsiegellaw.com Attorneys for Relator TEX PAT, LLC